A multifaceted quality improvement intervention: Decreased frequency of low value Heparin induced thrombocytopenia(HIT) panel orders

From the 2018 HVPAA National Conference

FNU Aparna (Crozer-Chester Medical Center), Kshitij Thakur (Crozer-Chester Medical Center)

Background

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an antibody-mediated pro thrombotic condition, with affected individuals having a greater than 50% risk of developing new thromboembolic events and the mortality rate is approximately 20%. The 4T scoring system is a validated tool that can significantly reduce the  number of unnecessary HIT panels ordered.

Objectives

We undertook a multifaceted quality-improvement (QI) intervention in a community hospital to decrease unnecessary HIT panels. Our primary aim was to increase the use of 4T scoring system before ordering HIT panels. Secondary aim was to reduce the number of HIT panels with low pretest probability of positive result by 20%.

Methods

The Q/I intervention was composed of introduction of HIT order set which provided an option of calculating 4T score at the point of order entry, and extensive education of house staff and faculty about the 4T scoring system. We performed a pre-post analysis, comparing a cohort of patients during the 18-month baseline period before the QI intervention and the 18-month post intervention period. Demographic and clinical data were collected from the electronic medical record.

Results

The baseline (n=154) and intervention (n=103) cohorts were similar in their demographics but showed a significant reduction in total number of HIT orders (p= 0.02852). In the pre intervention cohort 1% of HIT orders had a 4T score documented, this increased to 36% in the intervention cohort. The percentage of low probability HIT panels ordered was reduced from 62% in the pre intervention cohort, to 41% in the intervention cohort.

Conclusion

Implementation of a multifaceted Q/I intervention within a community hospital was associated with significant decrease in the number of HIT panels ordered. Further intervention by making 4T calculation a “HARD STOP” before ordering HIT panels in the EMR can further reduce “low value” HIT panels.

Implications for the Patient

HIT panel is an expensive send-out test with a turn around time of 4-5 days. Reducing unnecessary HIT panels avoids exposure to unnecessary non heparin anticoagulants. Reducing the low probability HIT panels can potentially reduce the length of stay for patient given long turnaround time for the test.

What are academic medical centers across the country doing to improve healthcare value?

Value improvement guides: Published reviews in JAMA Internal Medicine coauthored by experienced faculty from multiple leading medical centers, with safety outcomes data and an implementation blue print.

Review article detailing 25 labs to refine for high value quality improvement | July 2020

MAVEN campaign: Free 4 year high value care curriculum online.

Join the Alliance! Membership is free with institutional approval and commitment to improving value in your medical center.

Learn more about HVPAA on Health Affairs Blog